There is much talk about how our programs are (or should be) thought of in terms of systems, and quite a bit of progress is being made toward that end. But there is a difference between: • evaluating programs in terms of systems, and • evaluating the systems themselves, i.e. abstracting the system structure from the details of a program. The purpose of this document is to take a stab at the latter. Why bother? For two reasons. First, Understanding the system that underlies a program will help us understand the program. Second, similar systems structures may indicate similarities across seemingly disparate programs.
Blog
The Logic in Logic Models Part 2:
This is the second of two blog posts on the logic in logic models. (More will come in the future.)I discuss three levels of model specificity. The first is the siloed model that is specific only at a high level of abstraction (e.g., outputs --> outcomes). This model form lists, but does not specify relationships among elements within each high-level category. The second form is the “box and arrow” layout that is so common in evaluation. The third adds to the “box and arrow” form with additional information on relationships, e.g., designations of how strong or likely relationships are likely to be.
Some Notions About the Relationship Between Systems Thinking and Complexity
Some people asked me what I thought about the relationship between systems thinking and complexity. My answer deals with complex system behaviors that explain the rules that system-thinking uses to understand how systems work.
The Logic in Logic Models Part 1: Extending Models in the Directions of Less, and More Specificity
I’m working on a series about the logic that can/should be contained in logic models. This is the first in the series . It’s message is that the range of knowledge that can be reflected in a model can be extended in two ways. One is toward less specificity and detail. One is toward more specificity by designating connections in AND/OR terms. Either tactic can be appropriate, depending on the circumstances.
How do we Know? Some Interviews With Scientists
This section of my blog is an exercise in spreading knowledge about how scientists come to believe what they tell us. I want to explore whether scientists can explain their methods and deliberations well enough for us to make informed judgements about the worth of their messages.
Early Childhood Development Action Network Master Class in Systems Thinking: Complex System Behaviors that Can Help Us Plan and Evaluate
The Early Childhood Development Network is offering a set of master lasses in systems thinking. This presentation is my contribution.
Evaluation as Social Technology
This post explains why I think of myself as an engineer and not a scientist, and why I think you should too.
How to Evaluate a Conference
How to evaluate a conference with respect to attendees, exhibitors, and sponsors.
Why Do Hospitals Coordinate Activities as They Do? Or: What I Learned from My Hip Surgery
This comes from observations I made when I was recuperating from hip replacement surgery. As the opiates wore off, I started pondering what happened to me. This is the result.
Systems Evaluation, Meet Living Systems Science
This post explores the relationship between systems evaluation and concepts from Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
